≡ Menu

Professor Hoppe’s new book, The Great Fiction: Property, Economy, Society, and the Politics of Decline, is forthcoming from Laissez Faire Books, and discussed by Jeff Tucker in his post Conspiracies and How to Defeat Them. As Tucker writes:

“If you are unfamiliar with the work of Hoppe, prepare for The Great Fiction to fundamentally shift the way you view the world. No living writer today is more effective at stripping away the illusions most everyone has about economics and public life. Hoppe causes the scales to fall from one’s eyes on the most critical issue facing humanity today: the choice between liberty and statism.”

See also Jeff’s “Don’t Think About Elephants.”

The text of these articles is repixeled below—

Conspiracies and How to Defeat Them

Someone asked me the other day if I believe in conspiracies. Well, sure. Here’s one. It is called the political system. It is nothing if not a giant conspiracy to rob, trick and subjugate the population.

People participate in the hope of making our lives better, or at least curbing the damage government does. Yet look at the results: exactly the opposite. No matter who is selected as temporary front men to “reform” the system, the regime thrives and the population withers.

It should be obvious by now that reform doesn’t happen by drawing ever more people into the ranks of the oppressor class. But somehow, people keep getting pulled in. What’s more, the regime is fully aware of this, even if the population is not. So, yes, I would call it a conspiracy.

The word conspiracy comes from the Latin roots con and spiro, meaning to breathe together. It implies a shared interest and an understanding between people that doesn’t always need to be openly stated. In the normal use of the term, the purpose of a conspiracy is always negative or destructive — a deceptive plot to do something bad.

This is why the government is always accusing other people of conspiring — terrorists cells, armed resistance at home and abroad, rebellious and plotting sectors of society — but exempts itself completely. The regime regards itself as unimpeachably fantastic, never destructive, never nefarious. Therefore, it is incapable of conspiracy.

It all depends on how you look at it. You don’t have to work yourself into a fever over the Bilderbergers or the Trilateralists to see real conspiracy. Take a look at any government bureaucracy. Everyone there knows the goal: more power, more money and less work. The bureaucratic class “breathes together” toward the same nefarious goal of making itself safer and richer, while making normal life difficult for those who are subject to its dictates. And it all comes at the expense of everyone else.

The more dependencies government creates, the more people it can convince to go along with the conspiracy, and the better off it is. This is why Frederic Bastiat once described the political system as follows: “Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.”

The fiction part is the deception. It works only so long as the social consensus is there to support it. The task of anyone who opposes the great conspiracy, then, is to reveal and expose the reality that is being covered up by all the stories of all the wonderful things that government does. The fiction is unsustainable in light of logic and evidence. The curtain must be pulled back.

To my mind, the modern thinker who has best dissected the true nature of modern politics is Hans-Hermann Hoppe. He is incredibly clearheaded about modern politics, particularly the workings of democracy. It is a system of governance that was developed to give the people more direct control over the government; in fact, it has given the government more direct control over the people.

I’m pleased to report that Laissez Faire Books is publishing his next book, a massive collection with the title drawn from Bastiat: The Great Fiction. It will be released in electronic form to members of the Laissez Faire Club. So it comes free as part of the subscription.

As I’ve told many people, the Laissez Faire Club works like any high-end private club. Once you are a member, the drinks are on the house. And this book by Hoppe is one very stiff drink!

Joining the club right now gives you all the books we’ve already released — plus movie shorts to go along with them and forums to discuss them — and this Hoppe book plus many others come once per week. It is an incredible deal by any standard, and the perfect way to defeat the great conspiracy.

If you are unfamiliar with the work of Hoppe, prepare for The Great Fiction to fundamentally shift the way you view the world. No living writer today is more effective at stripping away the illusions most everyone has about economics and public life. Hoppe causes the scales to fall from one’s eyes on the most critical issue facing humanity today: the choice between liberty and statism.

The whole of Hoppe’s writings on politics can be seen as an elucidation of Bastiat’s point. He sees the state as a gang of thieves that uses propaganda as a means of disguising its true nature. In fleshing this out, Hoppe has made tremendous contributions to the literature, showing how the state originates and how the intellectual class helps perpetuates this coverup, whether in the name of science, religion or the provision of some service like health, security, education or whatever. The excuses are forever changing; the functioning and goal of the state is always the same.

The reader will be surprised at the approach Hoppe takes because it is far more systematic and logical than people expect of writers on these topics. I suspect that this is because he did not come by his views except after a long intellectual struggle, having moved systematically from being a conventional left socialist to becoming the founder of his own anarcho-capitalist school of thought.

This particular work goes beyond politics, however, to show the full range of Hoppe’s thoughts on issues of economics, history, scientific methodology and the history of thought. In each field, he brings that same level of rigor, that drive for uncompromising adherence to logic, the fearlessness in the fact of radical conclusions.

It seems too limiting to describe Hoppe as a member of the Austrian or libertarian tradition, for he really has forged new paths, in more ways than he makes overt in his writings. We are really dealing here with a universal genius, which is precisely why Hoppe’s name comes up so often in any discussion of today’s great living intellectuals.

It also so happens that Hoppe is also an extremely controversial figure. I don’t think he would have it any other way.Besides, this is always the case for truly creative minds that do not shrink from the conclusions of their own premises. The perspective from which he writes stems from a passionate yet scientific attachment to radical freedom, and his work comes about in times when the state is on the march.

Everything he writes cuts across the grain. It is paradigm breaking. Just when you think you have figured out his mode of thinking, he takes it in a direction that you didn’t expect. It is not only his conclusions that are significant, but the masterful way that he arrives at them.

It is my great honor as executive editor of Laissez Faire Books to be the publisher of a work of this significance. It is a testimony to the fact that progress in ideas is still possible in our time. So long as that remains true, so long as the tradition Hoppe represents is living and improving, we have reason to believe that human liberty has not and will not finally succumb to the great conspiracy.

Don’t Think about Elephants

The movie Inception (2010) directed by Christopher Nolan, is one of the few films I’ve seen that takes the idea of ideas themselves seriously.

It’s about a team of experts that specializes in corporate espionage by extracting information from dreams. This time, their job is much harder: They are asked to implant a new idea in someone’s head using the same methods.

The following exchange takes place to illustrate the power of an idea:

“OK, this is me, planting an idea in your mind. I say: Don’t think about elephants. What are you thinking about?”

Point taken!

Another character explains the deeper issue of either extracting or implanting ideas:

“What is the most-resilient parasite? Bacteria? A virus? An intestinal worm? An idea. Resilient… highly contagious. Once an idea has taken hold of the brain, it’s almost impossible to eradicate. An idea that is fully formed — fully understood — that sticks — right in there somewhere.”

In real life, people are implanting ideas in our heads all the time. If you watched either of the big political conventions over the past week, you know this. They tell us that we need them to keep us safe, secure, prosperous, virtuous, and fair. In their absence, something terrible will happen.

The goal here is a different version of espionage. We are being persuaded to give them money to conduct their campaigns and then, at the appointed hour, march to the government-designated spot and mark the ballot in the way they want us to.

Fewer and fewer are going along with this, but just enough comply to give the appearance of consent. Millions have an idea implanted in their heads and they act on it. It more or less works. It’s worked for a very long time. The system isn’t as healthy as it used to be, but it is still the best shot that the ruling elite have to elicit our cooperation.

What if most of what is happening at these partisan conventions is illusion? What if the real powers that run our lives are largely untouched by voting and elections? And what if these real powers are so vulnerable that if we stop believing in them, they will lose their power? What if the path to freedom were as clear as discovering reality after a period of dreaming?

This is the point of view of Hans-Hermann Hoppe. He is the author of the e-book of the week in the Laissez Faire ClubThe Great Fiction. It can be downloaded today with a $10 membership in the Club.

The Great Fiction explains the inner workings of the state like no other book. Hoppe digs deep into history, the origin of property, the nature of power, the truth about money, and many other subjects to show that much of what we tend to believe about the system is essentially a fable.

The apparatus of power does not protect us; it robs us. It does not stabilize the economy; it siphons of wealth from the many for the few. It does not keep us safe; it makes the world safe for them, but endangers our lives and prosperity. The intellectual class that is dispatched to defend the system of power is looking after its self-interest.

The Great Fiction is the lie pushed by the political class that the exploitation we face daily is necessary and inevitable. Neither is true. As part of the big fiction, there are many smaller fictions, as well. Hoppe discusses each in turn: the idea that the state provides our security, that it guards our money, that our societies are managed scientifically by experts, that the nation-state is some kind of immortal being that will last forever.

Hoppe is one of the leading intellectuals in the world today, a big thinker on the level of a Hume, Hegel, Kant, Marx, and Mises. The essays in here are some of his sharpest and most far reaching, dealing with property, money, society, law, and even the scientific method. His reputation in Europe is so large that people clamor for private invitations to his salon. He writings have been translated to a dozen languages.

Here is just a sample of some of the material you will find

  • Three marks of a state (that the state does not advertise)
  • Why a population puts up with the taxes, bullying, and bad service from the state
  • Why intellectuals turn to the state for support
  • Why compulsory education really exists
  • Why and how the state brings about the war of all against all
  • Why property rights exist only because of scarcity
  • Why every deviation from property rights leads to social loss
  • Why modern life is, in some ways, more savage than primitive prehistoric times
  • Why richer states are more aggressive
  • Why and how the family originated as an economic unit
  • Why self-sufficiency is the path to poverty
  • Why the Malthusian trap is real and how we escaped it
  • Why technological improvement necessarily grows from ownership and trade
  • Why the crucial ingredient that ushered in modernity is human intelligence
  • Why total privatization is not only possible, but desirable
  • Why it is naive to expect the state to ever reform money
  • Why the immigration issue is more complicated than either side admits
  • Why the best path forward for freedom must include the right to secede
  • Why truly just laws must necessarily extend from private property
  • Why there can be no religious freedom without property rights.

If you are unfamiliar with the works of Hans-Hermann Hoppe, prepare for The Great Fiction to cause a fundamental shift in the way you view the world. No living writer today is more effective at stripping away the illusions almost everyone has about economics and public life. More fundamentally, professor Hoppe causes the scales to fall from one’s eyes on the most-critical issue facing humanity today: the choice between liberty and statism.

The title comes from a quotation by Frederic Bastiat, the 19th-century economist and pamphleteer: “The state is the great fiction by which everyone seeks to live at the expense of everyone else.” He does not say that this is one feature of the state, one possible aspect of public policy gone wrong, or one sign of a state gone bad in a shift from its night watchman role to becoming confiscatory. Bastiat is characterizing the core nature of the state itself.

The whole of Hoppe’s writings on politics can be seen as an elucidation on this point. He sees the state as a gang of thieves that uses propaganda as a means of disguising its true nature. In fleshing this out, Hoppe has made tremendous contributions to the literature, showing how the state originates and how the intellectual class helps perpetuate this coverup, whether in the name of science, religion, or the provision of some service like health, security, education, or whatever. The excuses are forever changing; the functioning and goal of the state are always the same.

“Only few people can see through the entire charade,” he writes, “and even fewer have the courage to speak up against it.”

It is true, then, that Hoppe stands with a long line of anarchist thinkers who see the state as playing a purely destructive role in society. But unlike the mainline of thinkers in this tradition, Hoppe’s thinking is not encumbered by utopian illusions about society without the state. He follows Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard in placing private property as a central element in social organization. In justifying this point of view, Hoppe goes far beyond traditional Lockean phrases. He sees private property as an inescapable institution in a world of scarcity, and draws on the work of contemporary European philosophy to make his claims more robust than any of his intellectual predecessors’.

The reader will be surprised at the approach Hoppe takes because it is far more systematic and logical than people expect of writers on these topics. He came to his views after a long intellectual struggle, having moved systematically from being a conventional left-socialist to becoming the founder of his own anarcho-capitalist school of thought.

The dramatic change happened to him in graduate school, as he reveals in the biographical sections of this book. He takes nothing for granted in the course of his argumentation. He leads the reader carefully through each step in his chain of reasoning. This approach requires extraordinary discipline and a level of brilliance out of the reach of most writers and thinkers.

This particular work goes beyond politics, however, to show the full range of Hoppe’s thoughts on economics, history, scientific methodology, and the history of thought. In each field, he brings that same level of rigor, that drive for uncompromising adherence to logic, the fearlessness in the face of radical conclusions.

In light of all of this, it seems too limiting to describe Hoppe as a mere member of the Austrian or libertarian tradition, for he really has forged new paths — in more ways than he makes overt in his writings. We are really dealing here with a universal genius, which is precisely why Hoppe’s name comes up so often in any discussion of today’s great living intellectuals.

It so happens that Hoppe is also an extremely controversial figure. I don’t think he would have it any other way. Regardless, this is always the case for truly creative minds that do not shrink from the conclusions of their own premises. The perspective from which he writes stems from a passionate, yet scientific attachment to radical freedom, and his work comes about in times when the state is on the march.

Everything he writes cuts across the grain. It is paradigm breaking. Just when you think you have figured out his mode of thinking, he takes it in a direction that you didn’t expect. It is not only his conclusions that are significant, but the masterful way that he arrives at them.

Where does Hoppe see our current crisis ending? Here is a passage to give you a sense:

Empire building bears the seeds of its own destruction. The closer a state comes to the ultimate goal of world domination and one-world government, the less reason is there to maintain its internal liberalism and do instead what all states are inclined to do anyway, i.e., to crack down and increase their exploitation of whatever productive people are still left. Consequently, with no additional tributaries available and domestic productivity stagnating or falling, the Empire’s internal policies of bread and circuses can no longer be maintained. Economic crisis hits, and an impending economic meltdown will stimulate decentralizing tendencies, separatist and secessionist movements, and lead to the breakup of Empire. We have seen this happen with Great Britain, and we are seeing it now, with the U.S. and its Empire apparently on its last legs.

It is my great honor as executive editor of Laissez Faire Books to be the publisher of a work of this significance. This is more than a collection in the libertarian tradition; it is a testimony to the fact that progress in ideas is still possible in our time. So long as that remains true, so long as the tradition Hoppe represents is living and improving, we have reason to believe that human liberty has not and will not finally succumb to the great fiction.

Do your part by downloading and reading Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s book now at the Laissez Faire Club.

{ 0 comments }

Der Wettbewerb der Gauner: Über das Unwesen der Demokratie und den Ausweg in die PrivatrechtsgesellschaftAs noted previously, Professor Hoppe’s most recent book was recently published. It is an introduction to the field of private law societies and contains translations of several speeches held at the PFS and the LvMI, texts from LewRockwell.com and interviews from German newspapers. Amazon.de link; publisher’s website. (Other German-language publications and translations of Hoppe works.)

A new English translation of an interview with Professor Hoppe about his book has just been published:

I recently posted my own very loose translation of an interview in German conducted with Professor Hoppe, by the German web site, MisesInfo. Fortunately, on behalf of the Professor, Robert Groezinger has produced a much more polished and accurate version of the same interview, which is hot off the press, below, from his word processor. Share and enjoy:

First of all, Mr. Hoppe, thank you for taking the time to give us this interview. You have written in your new book, Der Wettbewerb der Gauner (“The Competition of Crooks”), that “We don’t need a European super state, which the European Union is seeking to establish … but rather a Europe and world consisting of hundreds or even thousands of tiny Liechtensteins and Singapores.” Such a trend is not apparent at the moment, rather the opposite. Do things first have to get even worse – politically and economically – , before they get better again?

Unfortunately, I’m afraid so. Before that we’ll probably have to experience national bankruptcy spreading through Portugal, Spain, Italy and ultimately on to Germany. Only then, I fear, will it become clear to everyone what many people already suspect now: that the EU is nothing but a gigantic machinery of income and wealth redistribution, from Germany and the Netherlands to Greece, Spain, Portugal, and so on. But that’s not all. It will also become clear that the same insanity, the same mess, exists even within each individual country: redistribution from Bavaria and Baden-Württemberg to Bremen and Berlin, from Little Town A to Little Village B, from one company or industry to another, from Smith to Jones and so on – and always following the same perverse pattern: redistribution from the more productive countries, regions, places, companies and individuals to those that are less productive or not productive at all. Bankruptcy will bring all of this to light in a dramatic fashion.

And perhaps then, finally, will come the realization that democracy – in whose name all these dirty tricks have been done – is nothing more than an especially insidious form of communism, and that the politicians who have wrought this immoral and economic madness and who have thereby enriched themselves personally (never, of course, being liable for the damages they have caused!), are nothing more than a despicable bunch of communist crooks.

Read more>>

{ 1 comment }

Interview mit Prof. Dr. Hans-Hermann Hoppe:

“Produzenten gegen Parasiten: Aufruf zum Klassenkampf”

 

{ 0 comments }

Democracy – The God That Failed

Andy Duncan (http://thegodthatfailed.org/) has been interviewed by Greg Moffitt on ‘Legalise Freedom’.

They discuss the works of Professor Hans-Hermann Hoppe, particularly, Democracy, The God That Failed.

Direct MP3 link:

{ 0 comments }

“Steuern sind Diebstahl”

Steuern sind Diebstahl

German translation of Hoppe’s Philosophie Magazine Interview on Taxation (2011).

{ 0 comments }

Der Staat ist eine kriminelle Organisation”  (The state is a criminal organization) Interview with Hoppe, Wiener Zeitung

Der Ökonom und Anarchokapitalist Hans-Hermann Hoppe spricht über die Mängel des Sozialismus, über Privateigentum als Voraussetzung für Wohlstand, untersucht die Zukunft der EU und plädiert für eine Welt ohne staatliche Regulierungen.

{ 0 comments }

Anarcho-Capitalism: An Annotated Bibliography–in Danish

Professor Hoppe’s 2001 article, Anarcho-Capitalism: An Annotated Bibliography, has been translated into Danish by Nicklas Augustine as Anarkokapitalisme – en kommenteret bibliografi. Other Danish translations of Professor Hoppe’s work.

Text:

[continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

Der Wettbewerb der Gauner: Über das Unwesen der Demokratie und den Ausweg in die PrivatrechtsgesellschaftA new book has been released in German with material from Prof. Hoppe and a foreword by Prof. Thorsten Polleit (main title in English: The Competition of Crooks). This is an introduction to the field of private law societies and contains translations of several speeches held at the PFS and the LvMI, texts from LewRockwell.com and interviews from German newspapers. Amazon.de link; publisher’s website. [PDF]

See also: Hoppe interview: Der Wettbewerb der Gauner (“The Competition of Crooks“)

{ 0 comments }

Dr. Hans-Hermann Hoppe despre impracticabilitatea unui Stat mondial şi despre eşecul democraţiilor de tip vestic, the Romanian translation of “Dr. Hans-Hermann Hoppe on the Impracticality of One-World Government and the Failure of Western-style Democracy,” The Daily Bell (Mar. 27, 2011), has just been published.

{ 0 comments }

Professor Hoppe was previously interviewed on Australian Broadcasting Corp. Radio, on the topic “Anarcho-capitalist libertarianism: What is it?” (approx. 25 minutes). It was aired on Jan. 23, 2012; audio is available here; the transcript is here, and below. As described on the ABC site, “What is anarcho-capitalist libertarianism? Hans Herman Hoppe explains the idea behind it and why it’s a very different and quite radical way to think about government, society and the economy.”

Transcript:

[continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

From my post at The Libertarian Standard:

Mises Academy: Stephan Kinsella teaches The Social Theory of HoppeLast year I presented four Mises Academy Mises Academy courses:

The audio and slides for the first three courses listed can be found in those links; those for the Hoppe course are appended below. The Hoppe course is discussed in my article “Read Hoppe, Then Nothing Is the Same,” translated into Spanish as “Tras leer a Hoppe, nada es lo mismo“; see also Danny Sanchez’s post Online Hoppe Course Starts Tomorrow. I enjoyed all four courses but my favorite was the Hoppe course. Hoppe has been the biggest intellectual influence of my life, as I detail in “How I Became A Libertarian” (published as “Being a Libertarian” in I Chose Liberty: Autobiographies of Contemporary Libertarians). I agree with Sanchez that “Hans-Hermann Hoppe is the most profound social theorist writing today.” This is one reason I worked with the brilliant Austro-libertarian theorist, and one of my best friends, Jörg Guido Hülsmann, and one of the greatest guys in the world, to produce the well-received and well-deserved festschrift, Property, Freedom, and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe (Mises Institute, 2009).

The experience of teaching the Mises Academy classes was amazing and gratifying, as I noted in my article “Teaching an Online Mises Academy Course.” This and similar technology and Internet-enabled models are obviously the wave of the educational future. The students received an in-depth, specialized and personalized treatment of topics of interest to them, with tests and teacher and fellow student interaction, for a very reasonable price, and judging by their comments and evaluations, they were very satisfied with the courses and this online model. For example, for the Hoppe course, as noted in A Happy Hoppean Student, student Cam Rea wrote, about the first lecture of the course:

Move over Chuck Norris, Hans-Hermann Hoppe is in town! The introduction to “The Social Theory of Hoppe” was extremely thorough. I, a relative newcomer to the Hoppean idea, was impressed by Stephan Kinsella’s introduction to the theory. Mr. Kinsella hit upon all of those who came before Hoppe, and how each built upon another over the past two centuries. In other words, as Isaac Newton stated, “If I have seen further it is only by standing on the shoulders of giants.” Hoppe is the result thus far of those who came before him in the ideals of Austrian Economics and libertarian principles. Nevertheless, Hoppe takes it much further as in the Misesian concept of human action and the science of “praxeology”, from which all actions branch in life.

Overall, the class was extremely enjoyable, the questions concrete, and the answer provided by Mr. Kinsella clear and precise. Like many others in the class, I look forward to more. So tune in next Monday at 7pm EDT. Same Hoppe-time, same Hoppe-channel!

There were also rave reviews given by students of the other courses.

Read more>>

{ 0 comments }

Hoppe and the Australian Mises Seminar

Professor Hoppe was the keynote speaker at the recent, very successful Australian Mises Seminar, 25-26th November, 2011, held in a private club in the Sydney CBD. Various posts about the event, and the videos released to date (which are in 1080p HD), are linked below.

Some more reports on the seminar and related posts:

The two videos available so far are embedded below:

Hoppe in Sydney 2011: “The State – The Errors of Classical Liberalism”

Hoppe in Sydney 2011: “Society Without State – Private Law Society”

Hoppe in Sydney 2011 – “Politics, Money and Banking”

Dr Steven Kates on the Classical School vs the Austrian School, includes responses from Hoppe

{ 0 comments }

Hoppe in Bucharest

Professor Hoppe spoke at the Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies on November 9, 2011. The four videos (two lectures with Q & A, one interview, and one seminar with discussion) are below:

From the blog post at Mises.ro: Video: Colocviu despre Teoria socialismului ?i a capitalismului cu Hans-Hermann Hoppe

Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Theory of Socialism and Capitalism after 20 years. A Colloquium with the Author from Mises Romania on Vimeo.

The author Hans-Hermann Hoppe, the translator Emanuel-Mihail Socaciu, and the former president of the Mises Institute, Dan Cristian Com?nescu, comment on the significance and ideas of “A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism”, and the legacy of the private Mises Seminar in Bucharest. The comments are followed by questions from the audience.

At the invitation of the Ludwig von Mises Institute Romania, on November 8-11, 2011, Professor Hans-Hermann Hoppe visited Bucharest for a series of events celebrating 130 years since the birth of Ludwig von Mises and 10 years since the foundation of the Romanian Mises Institute.

Videos below:

Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Theory of Socialism and Capitalism after 20 years. A Colloquium with the Author

Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Theory of Socialism and Capitalism after 20 years. A Colloquium with the Author from Mises Romania on Vimeo.


On Politics, Money, and Banking

On Politics, Money, and Banking (Hans-Hermann Hoppe) from Mises Romania on Vimeo.


Entrepreneurship with Fiat Property and Fiat Money


History, Natural Elites, and State Elites. An Interview with Hans-Hermann Hoppe

Hans-Hermann Hoppe gives a speech on Entrepreneurship with Fiat Property and Fiat Money in the Aula Magna of the Romanian-American University in Bucharest, and answers questions from the audience.

At the invitation of the Ludwig von Mises Institute Romania, on November 8-11, 2011, Professor Hans-Hermann Hoppe visited Bucharest for a series of events celebrating 130 years since the birth of Ludwig von Mises and 10 years since the foundation of the Romanian Mises Institute.

History, Natural Elites, and State Elites. An Interview with Hans-Hermann Hoppe from Mises Romania on Vimeo.

Entrepreneurship with Fiat Property and Fiat Money (Hans-Hermann Hoppe) from Mises Romania on Vimeo.

{ 0 comments }

Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics Discussed in Hebrew

Guy Kedem sent over a link to his article Dialogical Libertarianism: Ultimate Foundation of Ethics, which is a Hebrew-language discussion of Hoppe’s argumentation ethics theory of libertarian rights.

For more on argumentation ethics, see “Argumentation Ethics and Liberty: A Concise Guide,” Mises Daily (May 27, 2011) (includes “Discourse Ethics and Liberty: A Skeletal Ebook”).

{ 0 comments }

Hoppe and a Journey into a Libertarian Future

There is a very interesting five part interview (a sixth part is forthcoming), Journey into a Libertarian Future: Part V – Dark Realities (see Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4). It’s by Andrew Dittmer, who recently finished his PhD in mathematics at Harvard. Dittmer extensively quotes Hoppe’s writing from his Democracy book in this interview.

Update: Journey into a Libertarian Future: Part VI – Certainty.

{ 0 comments }

Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics in French

De la théorie économique du laissez-faire à la politique du liberalisme has just been posted (see below). This is a French translation of chapter 11, “From the Economics of Laissez Faire to the Ethics of Libertarianism,” and the Appendix, “Four Critical Replies,” of The Economics and Ethics of Private Property.

[continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

Entrepreneurship With Fiat Property and Fiat Money

Professor Hoppe’s article, “Entrepreneurship With Fiat Property and Fiat Money,” was published today on LewRockwell.com, and is based on a speech first delivered at the Edelweiss Holdings Symposion held in Zuerich, Switzerland, on September 17, 2011.

Update: Republished in Mises Daily on Nov. 18, 2011.

{ 0 comments }

Bucharest, Hong Kong, Sydney, Perth

Professor Hoppe has the following upcoming speaking events:

{ 0 comments }

Professor Hoppe’s article, Social Democratic Hayek: An Interview with Hans-Hermann Hoppe by Mateusz Machaj, previously published in Polish as Socjaldemokratyczny Hayek, has been translated into Swedish as Intervju med Hans-Hermann Hoppe om Hayek, Mises Sweden, Oct. 13 2011.

Related articles by Professor Hoppe include: “Why Mises (and not Hayek)?“, Mises Daily (Oct. 10, 2011) and F.A. Hayek on Government and Social Evolution: A Critique, Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 7 Num. 1 (1994)

{ 0 comments }